Actually, if you check the sites you will see that HM2 and PT4 have very similar prices, possibly even the same. If we have the machine for it, there is no comparison. When combined also with a Notecaddy purchase, the difference in what we can do with HM2 and what we can do with PT4 is huge. The upside to being a huge resource drain is that HM2 simply has more analysis power than PT4. If you have a slower machine and can't afford to upgrade, then PT4 is your only real choice, it lags so much less. An SSD is a highly recommended purchase if you want to get the most out of HM2, especially if you will be working with large databases. I was running HM2 on a laptop with 8GB of RAM and a quad-core processor, and it was still suffering from lag spikes until I also upgraded to a SSD (solid-state-drive). This basically means that you need a beast of a machine to get HM2 running smoothly – considerably more than the default minimum specification. Some people will prefer PT4, others will prefer HM2. The two tracking softwares have a lot of differences and to merge them into one piece of software would be doing the poker community an injustice. Both of the companies have now merged but continue to offer 2 separate products. Perhaps you are serious about tracking software but are not sure whether you should go for HM2 or the alternative Poker Tracker 4, which is also very strong.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |